A few weeks ago I finished reading Glenn Beck's Arguing With Idiots, and more recently I finished a book called Flying Blind. Apparently, being an old dude, I'm in the minority in that "reading" whether for pleasure or information is actually a good thing. All the latest tech sources of information are great, wonderful and all, but as far as I'm concerned a good book beats them all.
I bought Arguing With Idiots primarily for entertainment value, but was surprised at the amount of factual information that was presented in a logical method to make his points. I shouldn't have been surprised because regardless of what one thinks about Beck, it's extremely difficult to find fault with his facts and logic. If it was easy the loonies would attack him on those grounds, which they just don't do.
Flying Blind is about a radio talk show host and writer that started investigating the post 911 air travel security. His biggest claim is that the government and agencies have gone so far being politically correct that they're putting us all in danger. He believes that ethnical, and religious profiling is a necessity in today's world. He makes a good and valid argument in defense of that position. His investigations started when his 9 year old son was chosen for advanced screening, he volunteered to take his sons place, and this was acceptable to the screeners. This happened not once but 2 times. Then it got a real boost when he learned that airlines were fined by the Feds if they had more than 2 terrorist looking people in line for extra screening.
-----------------
Yesterday at the grandsons birthday party one daughter-in-law wondered at the advisability of allowing a 3 year old to play with toy guns when real guns were in the house. I've never thought about that much but I can see where it might give pause to some. I played with toy guns and my father had guns. My sons played with toy guns and I have guns. My grandson plays with toy guns and his father has guns. I personally know of no time where this has been an issue, despite what the psychologists and gun-phobes say. At the young age of 2 my grandson once asked if what I was holding was a real gun. Kids actually do know the difference.
Similarly I don't see a problem with kids playing war, and even most violent video games. I actually still play war in the guise of paintball games. We are actually playing at war. And again I personally know of no one that has gone on a killing spree that can even remotely be attributed to this play.
I wish the know it all, for your own good crowd would simply butt out.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Re playing with toy guns/playing war/violent video games etc.
I believe the people who think these things cause violence have it exactly backward.
I believe that human nature breeds some level of violent tendencies into most boys and some girls (as a generalization, my analysis is, of course, going to be wrong in a certain percentage of cases, but exceptions don't disprove the rule by any means). Boys and even some girls have such a fascination with guns and violence that, even if you don't allow them to play with toy guns, they'll use sticks, pencils, fish sticks, any number of other items to approximate them.
Playing gives kids a creative outlet for their violent tendencies and teach them to control and respect them.
Suppressing those tendencies rather than addressing and focusing them is extremely detrimental in my humble opinion.
I'm not a psychologist (which, in my opinion, is actually a positive when considering the validity of a position...but that's just me), but this is based on my observations and experiences and stems partially from seeing the differences in cultures having been raised on a farm in the country, but living most of my adult life and raising my kids in the city.
The kids who's parents allow their children to vent their aggressive tendencies through play in a controlled and supervised manner tend to be much more well-balanced and controlled in later years than those who are either have their violent tendencies completely suppressed, or who get no guidance and supervision from their parents while doing so.
Post a Comment